Type Here to Get Search Results !

SC issues notice to 11 states over Aadhar card issue

Supreme Court has issued notice for answering to those 11 states which have made Aadhar Card mandatory for availing benefits of various government schemes and services. Under this, Aadhar card has been made compulsory from receiving salaries to admission in schools and colleges, marriage registration and LPG gas connection etc. Bench headed by Justice BS Chauhan has asked answers from states to tell the nature of Aadhaar and if it has been linked to above services? Supreme Court has declared 10th December as the next hearing date for this issue. Aadhar card has been made mandatory for various schemes in Maharashtra, Delhi, Karnataka and other states.

Advocate Anil Deewan on behalf of the petitioner said that collecting personal information by the government is a violation of right to privacy of common man. Aadhaar scheme is totally a breach of fundamental rights. This is a violation of Article-14 (Right to Equality) and Article-21 (Right to Life and Liberty) of the Constitution of India. Government says that Aadhaar is voluntary but this is not happening. It is being made mandatory for various schemes and services by the state governments. Maharashtra Government recently said that if the concerned party does not have Aadhar card then the marriage will not be registered. During hearing Supreme Court said petitioner’s lawyer that during the argument it should be noticed that what is the reality. The harsh truth of this country is that food and water is more important than right to privacy of majority of the people. Will those people who fight for Rs. 1 and 2 for rice will talk about privacy? As far as children’s dissent is concerned, here marriages are done with parents’ wish. It will not affect all the clauses.


Supreme Court’s this comment came at that time when Mr. Deewan argued that private date of people is reaching to private sector. People’s privacy is being affected, the data which is being collected, there is no monitoring over it. Before this Supreme Court refused to amend that decision in which it said that Aadhar card cannot be made compulsory government schemes. A retired Justice of Supreme Court filed a PIL challenging validity of Aadhar card.